The populist narrative of supply chains focuses on sourcing ignoring the impact of historic practices that are no longer best practices creating waste and inefficiencies.
Build political capital to drive a supply chain planning culture.
Do these dogs hunt is a blog challenging the validity of the concepts of autonomous planning, probabilistic planning and the use of artificial planning in planning systems.
Let me start with why I selected a baby with ears for this post. I find that most companies’ understanding of supply chain planning is
The supply network–shipments and production of trading partners–represents over 70% of the environmental impact of supply chain decisions. Despite the importance, the investment in networks
When teams say that they want to move to outside-in processes using the crawl, walk, run approach, I say not so fast! The shift is a step change not an evolution. Here I share how to jump into the new paradigm.
I take supply chain management seriously. My focus is writing research for the business leader that is an early adopter attempting to drive first-mover advantage.
Like a secretarial typing pool, the definition of work for a supply chain planning is ripe for rethinking work. The redefinition cannot be crawl, walk and run. Instead, companies need to just JUMP!
Can we redefine the work of a supply chain planner through GenAI? I think yes. Here we share use cases.
The supply chain is a complex, non-linear system. Supply chain excellence is easier to say than define. The Supply Chains to Admire analysis, now in its tenth year and publishes here, celebrates 34 winners.
