
Hooey /hoo͞′ē/: Phooey /foo͞′ē/
This post aims to shed light on a dark, automated world where supply chain leaders believe they have answers and are busy automating outdated processes but not driving value.

This post aims to shed light on a dark, automated world where supply chain leaders believe they have answers and are busy automating outdated processes but not driving value.

The industry need state requires the redefinition of the current taxonomy of planning based on first principles. This is in conflict with the current thrust to automate existing platforms using agents.

Technology can change or even improve work. Companies today making a fundamental mistake: they are attempting to automate current processes with AI versus challenging and

Shifting sands. War. Tariffs. Shortages. Price increases. Ocean booking cancellations. Tightening of pocketbooks: changing demand patterns. Decline in consumer confidence. All are unsettling. Companies are

Thirteen years. 600 posts. Where does time go? For over a decade, since founding Supply Chain Insights in 2012, I have pounded the keyboard, asking

Today’s supply chains focus on cost reduction with the assumption that the reduction in cost will translate to margin. This is not the case.
The lack of organizational degrades value.

Do these dogs hunt is a blog challenging the validity of the concepts of autonomous planning, probabilistic planning and the use of artificial planning in planning systems.

Reflection and restatement of formerly held beliefs of supply chain management by Lora Cecere.

Let me start with why I selected a baby with ears for this post. I find that most companies’ understanding of supply chain planning is

When teams say that they want to move to outside-in processes using the crawl, walk, run approach, I say not so fast! The shift is a step change not an evolution. Here I share how to jump into the new paradigm.