New technologies

Can you Listen?

by Lora Cecere on August 1, 2011 · 1 comment

This week, Altimeter hosted a pilot event at our San Mateo office.  We were sold out and enjoyed the discussion with 80 thought leaders on the evolution of social listening.  Discussion on Listening  I had the pleasure, at the event, to interviewSusan Etlinger, Analyst Altimeter (blog http://susanetlinger.wordpress.com/) on her insights from the research that she completed on the topic on her soon to be released report. Here I share my insights.

 

Can you hear me?

Data types are proliferating. Data volumes are exploding. The certain path for Business Intelligence (BI) excellence is less certain. In the words of one of my clients last week, “We have a vision for structured data.  We buy more hardware, staff more Database Administrators and focus on higher speed processing.  We have met the challenge of 5X more transactional data in the last two years.  However, the world of unstructured data is a new frontier.  While we have scrambled to meet the structured data challenge, we are uncertain how to go about developing  vision for unstructured data. “   I think that this is our new world.

There are five elements:
Technology Worlds are Colliding.  The path to use unstructured data to listen to the customer and use it by the organization is evolving.  In he worlds of Susan Etlinger, “social analytics is aspirational.”  The interest is high, and the most frequent use cases are for brand sentiment listening, market program effectiveness evaluation and customer service.  Most of the interest is in marketing. At Altimeter, the evolution of listening platforms is one of the disruptive technologies that we are following.  The race for a solution is a collision course between two types of technologies:  enterprise expansionists and social reformers. Enterprise expansionists include companies like Clarabridge, SAS and IBM and social reformers include companies like Adobe/Ormniture, IBM/Coremetrics, Salesforce/Radian6, and Visible Technologies. We do not think that this space will be defined by what is often termed “social customer relationship management(SCRM).”  (The CRM approaches tend to be sales-driven focused on sales efficiency.  The focus is inside-out.) We feel the greatest opportunity is market-driven mining unstructured text to power outside-in processes.  The key to maximize the effectiveness is outside-in processes to listen and learn.

 The social reformers are further along on the development of data models and offer an easier to use solution.  The most common deployments are in marketing or public relations.  The enterprise expansionists solutions are deeper, more scalable and are a better fit into an enterprise BI strategy.  For the supply chain leader, these  three differences boil down to:

  1. One piece of the pie.  Market-driven processes are outside-in.  Sensing market changes to reduce the latency and improve the response.  Social is only one of many signals that offer promise in the design of market-driven processes.  Unstructured data in the supply chain is proliferating in many ways, not just in social networks.  This includes call-center data, distributor feedback, service and warranty claims, aggregated review data, B2b networks, etc.
  2. Do you know the questions to ask?  The less sophisticated social analytics platforms force the user to pre-build the questions to ask.  This assumes that the user is  knowledgable in the market to predict what is important.  If there is a market shift, the social analytic platforms are not flexible.  They cannot shift with the market.  they lack natural language processing capabilities to listen and learn and interpret market shifts.  In many ways, it is a lower level, less intelligent response. However, technologies from the social reformers are 2-5X lower cost and much easier to use.
  3. Data model.  Buy with the goal in mind.  The data models for the listening platforms are built for very different goals.  Get very clear on the intent.

Who will Win?  It is too early to tell, but we project a steep hype cycle with a long trough.  We also see convergence with large companies investing in the smaller social reformers.  The technology winner is too uncertain to predict. We feel that it will not be the traditional BI vendors or the CRM technologies.   As a result, buy the technologies with a focus on less than a two year return on investment and prepare to go through several evolutions as the market changes.  However, we feel that the real winner will be those that use the technologies to define unique differentiation.

Bottom line:  The first generation of technologies should be seen as an investment (in the words of one customer “throw away”.

Why Should Supply Chain Leaders Care?  In 90% of supply chain strategy documents that I read, companies state that they want to build a value network that extends from the customer’s customer to the supplier’s supplier.  However, the ability to listen to the customer in near real-time is new and EXCITING.  We believe that it will be a building block of outside-in processes.  It will help answer questions like:

  1. How do customers really like my new product? The technologies can reduce latency to sense true market sentiment by 80%.  With demand error of new products at 80% error, the building of outside-in processes to sense and respond could dramatically change the ability of a company to launch a new product successfully.  And, since new product obsolescence is the largest issue with product write-offs the impact could be substantial to many balance sheets.
  2. Early warning.  If there is a problem with my product in the market, how do I keep it from becoming headline news?   Today, product failures all too often become headline news. And, often history.  How many of these companies wish that they did not have this association?   Toyota and brakes.  Jeep and tire failure.  Conagra and peanut butter recalls.  Nestle and cookie dough cookie dough illness.   It is taking companies too long to determine that there is a problem and drive correction.
  3. New market opportunities. Harvesting demand insights.  The largest issue in the new product launch surveys that I have conducted for the past ten years is harnessing demand insights.  The building of intelligent listening posts can help companies gain a competitive edge.

Bottom line:  Listening posts and the building of listen and learn processes is fundamental to any supply chain focused on a growth strategy.

Who does it best?  We continue to be impressed by companies like Best Buy, Dell, Newell Rubbermaid, and Whirlpool.  Check out the pictures of the Dell listening center in Susan’s report. I love the picture!

Bottom line:  The companies that are doing it best have the strongest investments in social communities and commerce.  For leaders, it is an integral component of the strategy.
Barriers to Listening:  It is new and evolving.  Like any new technology there is a risk.  However, the largest barrier is not the risk of the technology, it is change management.  Fundamentally, organizations are incented to respond.  They are not motivated to listen.  As a result, the processes to listen, learn and drive an intelligent response are aspirational at best.

Bottom line:  How can you build demand-driven value networks without thinking about listening posts and listen & learn strategies.

Do you want to hear me?

Without investments in these technologies, if we are honest with ourselves, the answer to customer requests is “I CANNOT HEAR YOU!”  And, while historically, companies wanted to listen and to learn, today if they are not investing in the technology, it is largely because they either do not care about their customer or they are unaware.  What do you think?  Have you thought about investments to mine unstructured text to tie your supply chain to the voice of the customer?

Spice it up?

by Lora Cecere on July 22, 2011 · 0 comments

 

Wanted:  Orange shirts for green guys.   

Needed:  Community members with strong commitment, passion and vision. 

Yes, Spiceworks is calling all to a new form of community.  It is a new way of buying and deciding how to buy IT solutions.  It is one that is “spicing” up the sale of software and IT solutions.  The company’s name will be a new concept for most of my readers, but I feel that there are some significant trends to track. 

Background:

About a year ago, one of the founding partners of Altimeter asked me to share my perspective on VRM.   Sigh , I HATE acronyms.  I tried to control a visceral response.  Here was a new three-letter acronym in the market.  So, I obligingly asked, “What is VRM?”  The response was Vendor Relationship Management.  The look was: “What are you, Stupid?”  When I asked how VRM is different than Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), I got a dispassionate look.  Yes, the social guys are labeling what is known in enterprise applications as SRM as VRM.  SRM and VRM are procurement systems that are coming from different starting points, but are attempting to put the “R” (relationship) into the world of procurement.

In March, this little known community – Spiceworks — crossed this chasm.  Spiceworks is a community service designed to help small and medium businesses with improving networking decisions.  The community targets directors of IT that are buying materials, supplies and services to improve their IT networks.  Spiceworks recently added capabilities to enhance buying.  The company added features like Request for Proposal (RFP), purchase list management, organizing what they need to buy and evaluating purchases through ratings/reviews. 

Social is converging with supply chain management.  It is on the edges, and in the words of one of my fellow partners at Altimeter, Jeremiah Owyang, “There are two degrees of separation now.  Soon it will be one….”  It is for this reason, that I have been investing my time in understanding the definition of social applications and sharing insights on the pending convergence.

Why I think that it Matters:

For me, Spiceworks is a poster child of what is to come for enterprise applications.  It is a friendlier, more effective buying experience for four reasons:

Upside Down.  Changing the Paradigm.  It brings social to the business-to-business (B2B) experience.  To do this, the community launched 270 vendor pages and encouraged vendors to develop vendor ambassador personas –green guys– in the community.  A green guy’s role is to SERVE the community.  It is only after they SERVE the community can they earn the right to service the business.  Today, there are fifty green guys—vendors– active in the community.  A green guy, like Lauren Mccadney affiliated with CDW page is live at: http://community.spiceworks.com/profile/show/Lauren%20(CDW)?filter=contributions.

My point of view:  As you enjoy your cup of coffee this morning, consider JUST HOW DIFFERENT THIS IS.  Let me repeat:  a process where vendors serve the community first before they can ask for the sale.  This is a polar opposite from the traditional license sales model of enterprise applications.

Relationships matter.  The world of social is moving downstream to shape the face of enterprise applications and the enterprise application market is moving upstream embedding social capabilities.  I question how this will evolve?  In my quest for the answer, I asked Spiceworks for their perspective.  I asked, “Why did you build this functionality versus embedding existing Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) software?”  Their answer was interesting.  They felt that it was easier to build the functionality for three reasons:

  • Right fit for the market.  The Small and Medium Size Business Market (SMB) needs an easy to use solution.  Their term is “lightweight.”  The belief is that the existing SRM functionality is too complex for this market.
  • You can put enterprise into social, but it is tough to put social into enterprise applications.  Spiceworks perspective is product marketing teams within enterprise applications are not as focused on the social principles that build community.  Social is at the core of this new offering.  The belief is that it is easier to build transactional systems around the needs of social communities than to put social into enterprise applications.  (This is an interesting conundrum.  And, it is a point of view that Salesforce with Chatter or SAP with Streamworks does not endorse. But, my users of Salesforce Chatter or SAP Streamworks discuss openly how the social workflows are not well-integrated into the business application.  So, I am watching to see how this evolves.) (Is this analogous to you take the girl out of the country, but you cannot take the country out of the girl?)
  • Integrated Workflows.  The workflows in a community buying experience are different.  Spiceworks felt that it was easier to deliver integrated workflows by building the solution too.  In their words, “social is part of their DNA.”   It took them three months to build.
  • 

My Point of View:  We are on a collision course between social reformers and ERP expansionists.  I believe that the drive to design enterprise applications from the outside-in to be market driven and the need to build around relationships will tilt in the favor of the social reformers and not in the favor of the ERP expansionists.  The discontinuity of this technology trend will drive more and more buyers to cloud services.

A new chance to design reward systems.  Last week, when I was at SAP Base Camp, there was a discussion of how they get feedback from customers.  SAP has 24 industry groups designed to get customer feedback.  I give SAP kudos for designing one of the best customer advisory systems in the industry.  However, the governance model for the customer advisory boards for enterprise applications even in a more advanced form like at SAP is missing a critical ingredient.  It is one that was not possible in the 1990s when enterprise applications evolved.

My Point of View:   It is not sufficient to accept input equally from customers, instead, I think that the governance model should reward customers based on knowledge and rate input into development based on knowledge and contribution to the community.  This is counter-intuitive to the traditional enterprise application customer advisory boards that reward two types of behavior:  those that yell the loudest or the company that pays the most maintenance.  In social communities, the reward systems are critical to driving engagement.  For example, Spiceworks rewards community members based on a “heat rating” based on the spice level of peppers.  Community members compete to see who has added the most “Spice” to the community via a “heat index” based on pepper nomenclature (see figure 1).  Believe it or not, members of this community want to be a Capsician.   As a result, all users of the community instantly know the “credibility” of the user giving input.  Bottomline:  Users of software are not equal in either insights or knowledge.  Communities give us new ways to drive reward systems and to categorize feedback based on a span of knowledge.

Figure 1:  Spiceworks Pepper Index

Not just about Transactions.  It is a way for vendors to get feedback about options, new products, services and market requirements.  It can fuel innovation networks.  AMD and Intel are using it to gain early insight on features and market drivers.  Communities can play a new and exciting role in bi-directional feedback for innovation networks.

My Point of View:  The “ends” of the supply chain are frayed.  CRM and SRM are not sufficient APIs or adaptors to connect value chains. There is no “R” or relationship in these enterprise applications.  These adaptors and aligned, enriched relationships are an important steps in defining outside-in processes for demand sensing, insights for open design networks and ensuring social responsibility.  This is a trend that has broader implications.

Conclusion

Talking to Spiceworks both excites and depresses me.  I love what they are doing, but I wish that it had broader applicability.  I would like for there to be a Spiceworks type of community for supply chain management technologies.  I firmly believe that the traditional method of selling enterprise applications for supply chain– licensed sales with long sales cycles – is broken.  It only rewards the sales person that gets a large paycheck.  I would love to see supply chain applications sold on a community built for the community that can accelerate value and technology evolution.  I feel that this is a much better model than customer advisory councils.

I have read three surveys this week that estimate that supply chain managers trying to understand social concepts is less than 3% of the population.  While the flames are burning up the processes of marketing, and challenging the processes of human resources, the supply chain management community is largely unaware. This is my source of depression.

What do you think? Should VRM and SRM be allowed to co-exist?  How do you think that the worlds of social communities and enterprise applications will collide?  Are you ready for a friendlier, more social buying experience? 

I am in seat 1C on flight 1771 on my way to San Diego.  I am traveling between two client engagements.  One on the revisiting of Sales and Operations Planning to be outside-in on Software as a Service platforms and the second to better understand how to use structured and unstructured demand signals.   This is my world.  I am bridging between the old and new worlds of Supply Chain Management.  It is keeping me hopping.  Watch for more posts next week.