Lora's Latest Post

Is this the Future of Downstream Data?

It started as simple sales reporting. It is no longer simple.  In 2005, there were five consumer product leaders actively using downstream data (retail inventory and sales data).  Today, over 80% of consumer products companies greater than 1 billion in revenue are redefining work processes to use it.  The space is murky. It is not easy, and it is evolving. However, the deeper teams explore the usage of the data, the more excited they get.  This has been FUN to watch.
One of the things that you get to do as an analyst is name things.  We get to put OUR stamp –usually a cool three-letter acronym—on new technologies, processes and trends.  (At least, we think that it is cool.)  I am one of the mother’s of the Demand Signal Repository (DSR) term. It was originally defined by Kara Romanow, now Executive Editor at Consumer Goods Technology (CGT). I was an early collaborator with Kara.  It took shape and form from my fingertips as I wrote about the usage of downstream data in consumer value networks.  I have followed the market for the past six years.  Kara and I like to joke, that we were both mothers in the genesis and market acceptance of the term DSR.
A DSR is a repository of demand information. Demand information comes in many different forms—orders, shipments, syndicated data, point of sale information, warehouse withdrawal information from retailers, customer panel groups—and needs to be used by many different roles within the organization—sales for account reporting, marketing for promotional/new item acceptance and market share analysis, supply chain for forecasting and out-of-stock sensing, and R&D for new product launch insights.  The problem is that everyone wants it in a different form—frequency, granularity, attributes—and the data processes of cleaning, harmonizing and synchronizing are messy requiring a strong understanding of the data.

Help me Get it Right

So, as one of the mother’s—some would even disdainfully say “muther“—of the term DSR, I have been thinking about the evolution of this market and the market drivers, and I wanted to get some community input.  I am writing a report on market evolution and wanted to get community input on the evolution of the technologies.  (One of the exciting aspects of Altimeter Group’s research model is open research with the community.)  So, I welcome your feedback, do you think that these are the right trends?

Right Trends?

2010 will be the year of predictive analytics.  The DSR is not the end state.  The value of downstream data is the USAGE of the data into new business processes/work streams.  Whether it is Vision Chain’s new sensing of out-of-stocks, or Terra Technology’swork on short life cycle product sensing.  2010 is the year of predictive analytics.  Look for new applications to evolve.  I predict exciting launches in the area of price and promotion compliance, market basket analysis, shopping patterns, damage, and category analytics.  I find the convergence of loyalty data, point of sale information and geo mapping technologies very exciting to give live representations of market out-of-stocks, customer demand, and near real-time sensing of market trends.
In parallel, we will see market convergence of the technologies.  There are just too many sales reporting applications in the market, and predictive analytics vendors will need a database structure to enable insights from harmonized, disparate data sources (E.g. Nielsen’s TDLinkx product, orders, shipments, syndicated data, point of sale, warehouse inventory levels, retail inventory levels, etc).
It won’t just be about modern trade.  Hopefully, by now, it is clear to everyone that there has been a step change in data sharing by retailers in North America and Europe.  No, not everyone is sharing data; but, the data that is being shared gets more significant, and better quality, each year.  Customers that are working at getting the data now have  70% of North American and 30% of the European grocery markets.  (The secret is knowing how to ask for it.)
As companies use downstream data for modern trade, they will use the techniques to build demand networks to tackle the challenge of emerging markets.  The bullwhip effect of distributor relationships is just too painful. Consider the differences in table 1 for the food industry.
Table 1:  Bullwhip effect

Supply Chain Type Demand Latency from Shelf to Order Order Cycle Time Manufacturing Cycle
Modern trade for warehouse distribution 10-14 days 3 days 10-20 days
Emerging markets 40-48 days 1 day 30-40 days
Food service 24-35 days 2-3 days 30-40 days

 
Leaders will build distributor networks (similar to Anheuser’s Budnet) as part of the infrastructure to capture market share in the evolving markets.
Differentiation will come from enrichment and the design of the information layer.  To serve multiple roles and to enable new discovery, the secret sauce is the design of the information layer.  It is not a traditional Master Data Management (MDM) problem. Instead, it requires flexible data assembly and quick data parsing.  I believe that we will see the use of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) technologies like Endeca evolve to help companies solve this problem. (I saw some interesting evolutions of this concept in India past week.)   In parallel, new content—store demographics, in-store shopping data, panel data—will evolve.  These two elements will enable the true POWER from the new predictive analytics.
SAAS, License, Cloud.Initial forays into the usage of downstream data will be deployment neutral:  a true toss-up between license and Software as Service (SaaS) models.  However, as data enrichment and advanced predictive analytics evolve, the DSR will come behind the firewall. Similarly, as social media turns into social commerce, an information layer will evolve in the cloud for the value chain.  This value chain information layer will enhance not replace the enterprise DSR.

Figure 1: Downstream Data Evolution

Social Commerce will Power the Tipping Point.  As power shifts from the retailer to the shopper, social media technologies will power social commerce business processes (the ability to buy, return, shop on mobile devices based on reviews, price and inventory levels). Channels will blur as we enter the hype cycle of social commerce.  To power these applications Point of Presence (where is the shopper) will combine with Point of Sale (POS) to track the success of social CRM. The amplitude of the hype cycle will be immense—a mini dot.com era—but, it will be the tipping point for the usage of downstream data and the design of outside-in value network.

 Evolution. Do I have it Right?

So, what do you think? Do I have it right? Will it look like figure 1?  Let me know your thoughts.  Your input will serve as foundational input to refine the models for the report that I am writing on downstream data technologies in August.
Until then….  The Supply Chain Shaman is happy to be back from a very fruitful trip to India, and will be busy with research and advisory calls this week on the east coast of the United States.

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Is your Supply Chain AI Ready?

A simple quiz to assess an organization’s AI readiness.

The pace of change is fast and furious. Every day, technology advances faster than we can digest. A great challenge to have.

Determining whether a supply chain is “AI-ready” is less about technology and more about the gray matter between the ears of supply chain leaders. Leadership, alignment, and clarity of goals matter.

Too few companies are clear on the definition of supply chain excellence. Measuring and rewarding functional metrics reduces the firm’s value. Putting agentics on top of today’s processes can make bad practices run faster, reducing value.

The toughest job for the supply chain leader is challenging existing supply chain paradigms that were defined by the limitations of decades of supply chain technologies. As the curtain lifts on the potential of new forms of technology, process redefinition is our opportunity, but only if we are clear on what drives value. (Here, I link to the Supply Chains to Admire reports to help you define value. The next report will be published on June 23rd, along with my Dynamic Benchmarking Product, to help you define value in the face of your AI readiness. More information about the launch is at the bottom of this blog.)

Read More »

Case Study: A Scrappy Demand Management Approach

This study of Franklin Sports shines a light on the work that needs to be done at the sales account level to challenge a retail forecast, and also highlights the importance of a new technique for a forecast engine — reinforcement learning.

Artificial intelligence comes in many forms — large language models, generative AI, machine learning, unstructured text mining, deep learning, neural networks, reinforcement learning, agents, and agentics. While the industry is wigging out about agentics, I think reinforcement learning is a great step forward in the journey of Artificial Intelligence.

Read More »

Can We Side-Step the AI Spin Cycle?

When it comes to combining tech, 1+1+1 should equal more than 1. The impact should be exponential. Unfortunately, today, the answer is 0.

What do I mean? Let me explain.

I find that the supply chain technology market moves slowly along traditional technology lines. Conferences are usually focused on the use of technology, not on redefining work. This bothers me. I want it to bother you as well.

Here I share some insights to drive change.

Read More »

Supply Chain Health Check: The Power of an Orbit Chart

An orbit chart is a powerful tool for understanding the “health” of a supply chain and its potential for improvement. The supply chain is a complex, non-linear system with limited trade-offs. The relationship between trade-offs varies by industry, region, and size. The orbit chart is a diagnostic we use in the Supply Chains to Admire work. Here I explain the use case.

Read More »

Are You Writing a Check You Cannot Cash?

Don’t let a well-intending, but ill-informed consultant or technologist set an expectation that you cannot meet. No when wins when there is a check written that cannot be cashed. In this case, the consultant will move to the next account leaving you holding the bag. Fight back with a data-driven argument. Help the organization think about inventory more holistically.

Read More »