Lora's Latest Post

Have You Given Your Planner Love Today?

As I write this blog, Valentine cards scatter my desk. This is the week for love: a time to send cards and letters to those that we appreciate. I am in the middle of sending the cards to my grandchildren. It is in this spirit, that I write this post. The most unloved employees in the back office are supply chain planners. As supply chain leaders, I would encourage you to send each of them some love for Valentine’s Day. That to do? Here I give you some ideas that go beyond flowers and candy.

Background

Each year, when we complete our annual talent survey, we note greater and greater dissatisfaction within the role of supply chain planners. In Figure 1, note the lowest satisfaction is Generation X (birth years of 1965-1980) in manufacturing organizations. Note that academics and employees of technology software companies have a statistically significant higher level of job satisfaction. Within the data is the story of planners. The numbers are small, but the dissatisfaction is high.
Figure 1. Relative Job Satisfaction of Employees

Some Thoughts:

Supply chain management is heady stuff. A complex non-linear system is not easily wrangled by the uninformed. For every action there is an opposite reaction. The response is often surprising .
In Figure 2, we share insights on five characteristics of companies with a supply chain working well. Note the comparison to the larger population. Companies that outperform their peer groups have supply chain executives with a better understanding of supply chain management.
Figure 2. Characteristics of High-Performing Supply Chains
1) Market-Driven Processes.
Business cycles. Markets go up and down. Supply chains take their sweet time to respond. (It took six months for supply chain executives to sense the market downturn of 2007 and make adjustments to their supply chain. Why? Bad news (declining volumes) moves slowly across an organization while good news (increasing volumes) travels quickly. Today, companies seek a growth agenda, but the signs are omnipresent. The economy is slowing down.  Last week, the Wall Street Journal reached out to discuss the rising inventories near the Port of Los Angeles. In my share groups, large manufacturing clients have a Q1 freeze on travel.  (Normally the freeze begins in the third quarter.) I am no economist, but there are signs of a market slowdown.
During a market downturn, the life of a demand planner is tough. As the patterns of declining volumes rise to the surface, organizations struggle in disbelief. The unknowing supply chain leader will send demand planners back to their cubicles to “fix the demand plan.” (In other words, forced to concoct a story of growth in a market that is slowing down. Planners hate this stress.) Tensions rise as demand planners attempt to do their jobs in an organization that does not want to engage with market data.
The answer? Embrace the data and use the work of demand planners to see early signs of the market downturn. Use the information to adjust the supply chain to minimize the impact.

2) The Story of Policy, Strategy, and Modeling.

The supply chain combines policy, strategy and models. However, there is a disconnect. Despite the fact that supply chain modelers have great insights, they model; but do not drive strategy. These planners are often stuck at low-levels of the organization struggling with what to tell the “boss” when the strategy decisions are not feasible.
The action? Align. Ask data modelers using supply chain strategy tools to validate policy and refine the outcomes. Make the modelers important members of the team. The more that they feel involved, the greater the love.
3) Buy Technologies that Supply Chain Planners Will Love.
Over 65% of supply chain planning happens in Excel spreadsheets. One of the reasons? Usability. The second? The ability to model the supply chain in the technology. Models are not created equally.
Many times it is the result of the purchase of supply chain planning technologies purchased based on IT standardization. The lack of usability and modeling capabilities drive dissatisfaction.
Figure 3. Planning Technology Satisfaction

As shown in Figure 3, satisfaction with planning technologies low. The gap is greater in emerging economies. User satisfaction is the same as the flip of a coin.
Next steps? Focus on buying planners systems based on usability and modeling capabilities. Make sure that the planners have the right stuff. Make their jobs easier. As shown in Figure 4, the fit of technologies to do adequate modeling is significant gap.
Figure 4. Gaps in Planning Technologies
So, when Valentine’s day rolls around, feel free to buy your planners lunch or host a celebration. Love in any form is a great thing; but to make a long-term impact, don’t forget to address the tough issues that drive the low-level of planning satisfaction.  I would start with these three.

Prior Blog Posts:

For additional reading, check out these posts.
Have You Given Your Demand Planner Some Love Today?
Selection of a Supply Chain Planning Solution
Supply Chain Planning Is Like A Flip Of A Coin

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Reflection and Celebration for the Supply Chains to Admire Methodology

The Supply Chains to Admire to is an objective, data-driven standard for measuring supply chain excellence and moves beyond industry reputation, anecdotal evidence, and technology claims. Using revenue growth, operating margin, inventory turns, and return on invested capital (ROCE, the research evaluates how companies perform relative to industry peers over time. Here Lora shares information on an upcoming event to celebrate the Supply Chains to Admire Award Winners.

Read More »

Five Things I Don’t Understand

Solutions that we never imagined years ago are emergining, but I pause when companies are unwilling or unable to roll up their sleeves and redefine work. Historic practices are not best practices, and there is a wealth of opportunity for those that do challenge the existing status quo. .

Read More »

My Answer to Joe. The Future of APS

Traditional Advanced Planning Systems (APS) are unlikely to become true enterprise platforms because organizations remain functionally siloed, metrics are misaligned, and current APS architectures were designed for an environment that has fundamentally changed. Here I share how I think that APS systems can adapt to drive more value.

Read More »

Teaching Your Organization to Jump

Remember the story of the frog in the pot of water? If the water temperature rises slowly, the frog doesn’t recognize the danger until it is too late. Put the frog directly into boiling water, and it jumps.

I think the analogy applies to today’s supply chains.

Companies are absorbing increasing volatility and complexity without fundamentally redefining how work gets done. Companies have confused historic practices with best practices. They are now taking those same processes and attempting to automate them with agents and agentic AI—without first stopping to ask a more fundamental question: Is it time to jump? Here I give a five-step action plan.

Read More »

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Read More »

Warning: Sidestep the Narrative of the Misguided Goldiggers

Ten years ago, I started writing a book titled Stories of the Misguided Gold Diggers. The book was a collection of stories from two decades of stories of technology leaders perpetuating the myth of integrated end-to-end supply chain planning.

I dusted off the manuscript on Saturday. I think that we have a new chapter. Companies focused on putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) on top of existing architectures are putting AI Stupid on steroids.

Read More »