Lora's Latest Post

Supply Chain Talent: The Missing Link?

Members of today’s supply chain teams are busy. Business complexity is rising and teams are trying to get to data and align the organization against supply chain objectives. It is not easy. Disparate systems and gaps in supply chain technologies lead the list. Supply chain talent falls midway on most lists. We think that it should be more important. Here I share insights from a recent talent study conducted in conjunction with Supply Chain Brain.
In the last decade, supply chain talent has increased in focus. Over 76% of companies have a supply chain organization, and 32% of companies have a dedicated HR team focused on supply chain human resources.  The primary focus is on new hire programs and onboarding of college recruits. Progress has been made in new hire recruiting with the average company having a supply chain HR department for seven years.
Figure 1.   Supply Chain Positions with Greatest Talent Shortage

The missing link in supply chain talent is mid-management. While many companies have focused on hiring entry-level talent from universities, the looming issue is turnover and a shortage of mid-level managers, especially in supply chain planning positions.  As shown in figure 1, the shift is fundamental.
While companies today are struggling with change management and the adoption of new business practices, the looming issue is upcoming baby-boomer retirements. The most important activity that supply chain leaders can take now to mitigate turnover and attrition in mid-management planning positions is to define clear job progression and career paths for mid-managers.
The pain is high and growing higher. Sixty percent of companies surveyed have open positions. The ability to recruit, train and develop employees is growing more difficult.  As shown in figure 2 below, the greatest challenge is supply chain planning.  While positions in customer service, transportation management and procurement are relatively easy to fill, the positions in mid-management, especially in supply chain planning leadership, are growing more difficult to recruit.  Today, the average company has 15% of jobs open and 42% are attempting to fill the positions from within. There is more demand than supply.
Figure 2.   Ease or Difficulty Filling Supply Chain Positions

The Answers Are Not Easy

So, what is the opportunity for supply chain leaders to mitigate issues with mid-management supply chain leader retention? The answer lies not with benefits, image or salary. Instead, the primary drivers to mitigate the pain are clear definition of career paths, the opportunity for cross training and skill advancement.
Interestingly, in the face of this looming issue, only 16% of companies are increasing their budget for supply chain training.  For manufacturers and distributors, current  training is typically left up to the individual or offered as part of a project. Only 18% of companies have a clear road map with a preset budget for supply chain leader training. This is problematic.
The answer lies in cross training, clear job definition with skill progression, and skill building. Employee turnover will be high, but those that build talent will fare better.  The clock is ticking. What are you doing about the missing link?
For the full report, check it out on Supply Chain Brain’s website. And, join us for our upcoming webinar with industry specialists to discuss the issue and the potential solution. (We had to cancel the webinar on November 8th due to the disruption of power in the Northeast. It will be rescheduled soon.)
For more on supply chain talent see this blog post.

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Five Things I Don’t Understand

Solutions that we never imagined years ago are emergining, but I pause when companies are unwilling or unable to roll up their sleeves and redefine work. Historic practices are not best practices, and there is a wealth of opportunity for those that do challenge the existing status quo. .

Read More »

My Answer to Joe. The Future of APS

Traditional Advanced Planning Systems (APS) are unlikely to become true enterprise platforms because organizations remain functionally siloed, metrics are misaligned, and current APS architectures were designed for an environment that has fundamentally changed. Here I share how I think that APS systems can adapt to drive more value.

Read More »

Teaching Your Organization to Jump

Remember the story of the frog in the pot of water? If the water temperature rises slowly, the frog doesn’t recognize the danger until it is too late. Put the frog directly into boiling water, and it jumps.

I think the analogy applies to today’s supply chains.

Companies are absorbing increasing volatility and complexity without fundamentally redefining how work gets done. Companies have confused historic practices with best practices. They are now taking those same processes and attempting to automate them with agents and agentic AI—without first stopping to ask a more fundamental question: Is it time to jump? Here I give a five-step action plan.

Read More »

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Read More »

Warning: Sidestep the Narrative of the Misguided Goldiggers

Ten years ago, I started writing a book titled Stories of the Misguided Gold Diggers. The book was a collection of stories from two decades of stories of technology leaders perpetuating the myth of integrated end-to-end supply chain planning.

I dusted off the manuscript on Saturday. I think that we have a new chapter. Companies focused on putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) on top of existing architectures are putting AI Stupid on steroids.

Read More »

The Myth of End-to-End Planning

Supply chain planning, supply management, supply chain execution, network design, and transportation/logistics management operate in silos. Not much has changed over four decades. The connections flow back through transactional systems: order-to-cash and procure-to-pay. There is a myth that companies can buy an end-to-end supply chain management solution. This is largely a myth. Here we explain.

Read More »