Reflections

January 12, 2012
11:04 am

It has been two years since I resigned from AMR Research. At AMR, I had written over 600 articles on supply chain, and I managed a group of analysts. I was very “vested” in what I did there. When Gartner bought AMR, I cried. I made a decision that I needed to leave. I had worked for Gartner before.
In January 2010, I had a lump in my throat as I sat and looked at my computer screen. My research belonged to my prior employer. I erased my computer clean and started again. I no longer had access to the five years of research that I had built. I had to start over. In this post, I want to share my insights that I have today about supply chain management over these past two years.

What I have Learned:

Today, I reflect on where the industry is, my contribution to it, and my goals going forward. I make three commitments to my readers
Maturity. The companies that I worked with at AMR Research did not represent a normal distribution of supply chain practitioners. Companies self selected when they joined the AMR Research community. They were more active in the field of supply chain, and as a result, they had a higher level of maturity. Many were actively competing for top billing on the AMR Research Top 25 listing of Supply Chain Leaders. As a result, much of the research that I wrote while at AMR was for a more advanced practitioner.
I was asked Monday night by a client about my predictions as an analyst. Her question was, “How accurate were they?” Good question I thought. So, I went home and I thumbed through my written research. I found the predictions. About 70% of them happened, but I found that I was too optimistic. The timing was off. I am usually ahead of the market. My commitment to my readers is to try to be more grounded and practical.
Geek Speak. As I thumbed through my written research at AMR (I only have it in hard copy now), I winced at the Geek Speak. As one of the first generation of supply chain pioneers, I did not create a compelling message. I like most lost our way. Supply chain should have been about business value, but we wrapped ourselves around geek speak. I, ERP’d, APS’d, SCE’d, SCM’d my reader to death. I am sorry.
A current example of this in today’s market is the writing about SOMOLO omnichannel consumer experience. These will not be terms that I will use. Instead, I say “Really?” Does your teenage daughter say that they are going to go to the mall to experience the SOMOLO omnichannel experience? I don’t think so. I think that we are improving and redesigning the shopping experience through the convergence of technologies. Going forward, I am committed to the reader of this blog to sidestep Geek Speak and focus on what drives business value.
Vendor Influence of Analysts can yield bad Advice for Users. There is tremendous pressure within established analyst organizations to write positive pieces about vendors. In fact, it is better to write nothing at all as analyst, than to take a negative position. Trust me. I have the scars.
Large vendor organizations have internal analyst relations teams who are machines that are designed to squash anything that is the least bit negative. Yes, it is definitely a machine. And, I do not think that the business model has been good for the industry.
I am so GLAD to be out of that pressure. I feel bad that I was not allowed to take stronger positions on what I saw in the formative years of the evolution of supply chain management technologies. I tried; but I do have great stories to tell my friends over a glass of wine. However, what I can commit to, for my readers in 2012, is to tell it like it is. When I take a position, I will send it to the vendor for a 24 hour factual accuracy review, but I am going to make the hard calls. My writing is not going to be influenced by any provider of technology.

Back to Writing

OK, enough for now. I have to get back to writing the book, Bricks Matter. I finished 7000 words in the last three days and I had some great interviews this week with five great supply chain leaders. <These guys are definitely ahead of the pack.> I am also working on building a supply chain index of how companies year-over-year built value through supply chain practices, but more on that later.
Next week, I am at NRF and then flying to Barcelona to discuss market-driven supply chain practices with 21 leaders from emerging countries. The following week, I will be at the GMA/FMI conference. I then travel from Orlando to Washington, DC where I will be speaking to a group of government officials on how to use supply chain data to improve US infrastructure. On January 26th, I will fly to Las Vegas to facilitate the S&OP IE event. I hope to see you in my travels. Look for my posts. I will not forget my commitments.

AI Defining a Middle Ground Between Custom and Packaged Applications in Supply Chain Planning

October 26, 2026 4:54 pm

Supply chain planning has evolved technologically, but its underlying processes remain rooted in historic practices that no longer fit today’s volatile, complex environment. Packaged applications promise faster, lower-cost, lower-risk business outcomes, yet extensive customization, fragmented data, and rigid workflows often undermine that promise. Cloud data and AI platforms like Databricks and Snowflake offer an alternative: build interoperable applications on top of existing planning systems to address gaps in direct procurement, plan consumption, bullwhip reduction, operational planning, and dynamic master data. The opportunity is not simply to automate existing processes with AI and agentics, but to redefine how work gets done through end-to-end orchestration, value-based trade-offs, and clear decision governance.

Reflection and Celebration for the Supply Chains to Admire Methodology

October 19, 2026 12:00 am

The Supply Chains to Admire to is an objective, data-driven standard for measuring supply chain excellence and moves beyond industry reputation, anecdotal evidence, and technology claims. Using revenue growth, operating margin, inventory turns, and return on invested capital (ROCE, the research evaluates how companies perform relative to industry peers over time. Here Lora shares information on an upcoming event to celebrate the Supply Chains to Admire Award Winners.

Five Things I Don’t Understand

October 13, 2026 6:25 pm

Solutions that we never imagined years ago are emergining, but I pause when companies are unwilling or unable to roll up their sleeves and redefine work. Historic practices are not best practices, and there is a wealth of opportunity for those that do challenge the existing status quo. .

My Answer to Joe. The Future of APS

October 1, 2026 12:47 am

Traditional Advanced Planning Systems (APS) are unlikely to become true enterprise platforms because organizations remain functionally siloed, metrics are misaligned, and current APS architectures were designed for an environment that has fundamentally changed. Here I share how I think that APS systems can adapt to drive more value.

Teaching Your Organization to Jump

September 25, 2026 11:18 pm

Remember the story of the frog in the pot of water? If the water temperature rises slowly, the frog doesn’t recognize the danger until it is too late. Put the frog directly into boiling water, and it jumps.

I think the analogy applies to today’s supply chains.

Companies are absorbing increasing volatility and complexity without fundamentally redefining how work gets done. Companies have confused historic practices with best practices. They are now taking those same processes and attempting to automate them with agents and agentic AI—without first stopping to ask a more fundamental question: Is it time to jump? Here I give a five-step action plan.

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

August 30, 2026 5:28 pm

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Supply Chain Shaman