Lora's Latest Post

Patterns Tell the Story of Supply Chain Excellence

Pattern recognition is the ability to discern patterns in data and use the insights for further analysis.

Wikipedia

In 2014, I was exploring methods to publish what is now the Supply Chains To Admire report. Fortuitously, I hired a bright summer intern named Alex that introduced me to orbit charts. The use of orbit charts allowed me to see the patterns of performance at the intersection of metrics over time. By charting the performance against peer groups, I could see the story. For the past decade, I have been studying these patterns.

The first step was to find a reliable data set and establish the peer groups. We purchase data from Y charts. (A syndicated data feed used for financial analysts. This data source synchronizes corporate reporting across global markets while tracking restatements, name changes, and currency shifts.) We have archived corporate reporting from Y charts for 1982-2023.

The second step of establishing peer groups was trickier. It took us four years to establish what we believe are representative peer groups based on the performance patterns. We experienced enormous issues with NAICS and SIC codes. To build the peer groups, we asked business leaders to tell us who they thought was a reasonable peer group. There is no perfect methodology, and the peer group discussions continue.

Studying Performance of the Gartner Top 25 Award Winners

Plotting corporate patterns against peer group performance through orbit charts enables a quick understanding of supply chain excellence. Consider Lenovo in Figure 1. Lenovo ranked as # 10 on the Gartner Top 25. As an aside, I do not think that Lenovo is an example of a supply chain excellence. Look at this orbit chart and let me know your feedback.

Figure 1. Year-over-Year Performance of Lenovo Compared to the B2B Technologist Peer Group

The first part of the story is Lenovo drove considerable improvement in margin in a tough period of 2020-2023, but the company is underperforming the market on margin. Lenovo posts a 2% average margin compared to the industry average of 6%. The second part of the story is that inventory turns for Lenovo are 10.8, but declining.

Let’s take a look at PepsiCo. Ranking at #13, PepsiCo outperforms on inventory turns, but performance is declining. The company underperforms on margin.

Figure 2. Performance of PepsiCo Compared to Beverage Peer Group for the Period of 2013-2023

Now let’s compare these patterns to a company driving improvement and outperforming. In Figure 3, we depict Crocs. The Company drove a pattern of improvement year over-year surpassing the industry in the 2019-2020 period. The secret? Innovation in plastic shoe design, and the design of the supply chain to maximize value.

Figure 3. Pattern of Crocs Performance for the Period of 2013-2023 at the Intersection of Operating Margin and Inventory Turns

Wrap-up

I hope that this helps. I hope you find the patterns as useful as I do.

Let us know if you would like for us to chart your company. A useful technique is to chart divisions against the industry peer groups.

If you are in the US, have a great Memorial Day! I will be slinging mulch bags in my garden. I have two pallets to throw over the next two days. Hopefully, I will be able to walk on Tuesday for my client strategy day.

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Read More »

Warning: Sidestep the Narrative of the Misguided Goldiggers

Ten years ago, I started writing a book titled Stories of the Misguided Gold Diggers. The book was a collection of stories from two decades of stories of technology leaders perpetuating the myth of integrated end-to-end supply chain planning.

I dusted off the manuscript on Saturday. I think that we have a new chapter. Companies focused on putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) on top of existing architectures are putting AI Stupid on steroids.

Read More »

The Myth of End-to-End Planning

Supply chain planning, supply management, supply chain execution, network design, and transportation/logistics management operate in silos. Not much has changed over four decades. The connections flow back through transactional systems: order-to-cash and procure-to-pay. There is a myth that companies can buy an end-to-end supply chain management solution. This is largely a myth. Here we explain.

Read More »

Lead Time: A Broken Gossamer

If you are struggling with supply chain planning, dancing in the light of shiny objects, and scratching your head, please read on. My goal is to help you.

Please do not AI Stupid. What do I mean? AI Stupid is putting agents and agentics on top of existing architectures believing that making them faster and hands free add value. To me, this is fools play.

I love AI. I am excited about new technologies. To this end, I want to shine a light on how new technologies can help address the black holes and inconsistencies in today’s supply chain, which largely stem from the limitations of the first generation of supply chain planning and execution technologies. In this blog, I give you three places to start.

Read More »

Do You Need a Supply Chain Coach?

Supply chain is where the rubber hits the road. For a public company, over 40% of market capitalization is tied to the trade-offs between growth, operating margin, inventory management, and Return on Capital Employed.

The road for supply chain improvement is fraught with issues. Here we share some and offer some advice.

Read More »

Is your Supply Chain AI Ready?

A simple quiz to assess an organization’s AI readiness.

The pace of change is fast and furious. Every day, technology advances faster than we can digest. A great challenge to have.

Determining whether a supply chain is “AI-ready” is less about technology and more about the gray matter between the ears of supply chain leaders. Leadership, alignment, and clarity of goals matter.

Too few companies are clear on the definition of supply chain excellence. Measuring and rewarding functional metrics reduces the firm’s value. Putting agentics on top of today’s processes can make bad practices run faster, reducing value.

The toughest job for the supply chain leader is challenging existing supply chain paradigms that were defined by the limitations of decades of supply chain technologies. As the curtain lifts on the potential of new forms of technology, process redefinition is our opportunity, but only if we are clear on what drives value. (Here, I link to the Supply Chains to Admire reports to help you define value. The next report will be published on June 23rd, along with my Dynamic Benchmarking Product, to help you define value in the face of your AI readiness. More information about the launch is at the bottom of this blog.)

Read More »