Lora's Latest Post

Sales and Operations Planning: Putting the Pieces Together

Where has two years gone?  I have been working on a report on the evolution of S&OP technologies for the last two years.  Normally, a report is much quicker for me, but this one has been difficult, because of the many nuances.  There are three dynamics in play: the definitions of the basic process terms have changed, the technologies have improved, and the market is over-hyped by technology and consulting pundits. It has taken (even an old analyst gal like me) months to figure this out.
The report that I will publish next week is a guidebook on how to put the technologies together based on the process goal/maturity.  It has been reviewed by all the major technology providers and is designed to help line-of-business users architect their S&OP solution platforms.  There are many reasons why this is important, but the ones that came to the top in the research are listed below.
In qualitative interviews with 60 line of business supply chain leaders, when asked what is your focus for S&OP in 2011, the response was:

  • 90% of supply chains are grappling with skyrocketing costs and supply volatility.
  • 87% are struggling with the integration of business planning and supply chain planning technologies.
  • 85% of supply chains experienced a disruption.
  • 62% of companies have multiple S&OP processes.
  • Uniform frustration that industry progress on working capital has stalled.

There are several major shifts in the technologies:

  • Evolution of a S&OP Platform:  Recognition that there is a need for a S&OP platform for demand translation, mix analysis and analysis of differing units for volume (always amazed at how many different definitions of volume there are in an organization).  This also is evolving to connect the multiple S&OP processes together.
  • Change in how Planning is Done:  Movement from tight integration of demand and supply to the need for iterative analysis between demand, inventory, financial and supply modeling.
  • S&OP Execution:  Evolution of S&OP execution to tie planning to execution.
  • Better Analysis:  Deeper modeling and what-if capabilities.
  • Improved Visualization:  Better visualization of S&OP processes for the executive S&OP meetings.

To hear the webinar, click on the link http://vimeo.com/32284837  The slides are also available on slideshare at http://www.slideshare.net/Altimeter/not-your-fathers-sop.
What do you think?  I welcome your feedback.

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

AI Defining a Middle Ground Between Custom and Packaged Applications in Supply Chain Planning

Supply chain planning has evolved technologically, but its underlying processes remain rooted in historic practices that no longer fit today’s volatile, complex environment. Packaged applications promise faster, lower-cost, lower-risk business outcomes, yet extensive customization, fragmented data, and rigid workflows often undermine that promise. Cloud data and AI platforms like Databricks and Snowflake offer an alternative: build interoperable applications on top of existing planning systems to address gaps in direct procurement, plan consumption, bullwhip reduction, operational planning, and dynamic master data. The opportunity is not simply to automate existing processes with AI and agentics, but to redefine how work gets done through end-to-end orchestration, value-based trade-offs, and clear decision governance.

Read More »

Reflection and Celebration for the Supply Chains to Admire Methodology

The Supply Chains to Admire to is an objective, data-driven standard for measuring supply chain excellence and moves beyond industry reputation, anecdotal evidence, and technology claims. Using revenue growth, operating margin, inventory turns, and return on invested capital (ROCE, the research evaluates how companies perform relative to industry peers over time. Here Lora shares information on an upcoming event to celebrate the Supply Chains to Admire Award Winners.

Read More »

Five Things I Don’t Understand

Solutions that we never imagined years ago are emergining, but I pause when companies are unwilling or unable to roll up their sleeves and redefine work. Historic practices are not best practices, and there is a wealth of opportunity for those that do challenge the existing status quo. .

Read More »

My Answer to Joe. The Future of APS

Traditional Advanced Planning Systems (APS) are unlikely to become true enterprise platforms because organizations remain functionally siloed, metrics are misaligned, and current APS architectures were designed for an environment that has fundamentally changed. Here I share how I think that APS systems can adapt to drive more value.

Read More »

Teaching Your Organization to Jump

Remember the story of the frog in the pot of water? If the water temperature rises slowly, the frog doesn’t recognize the danger until it is too late. Put the frog directly into boiling water, and it jumps.

I think the analogy applies to today’s supply chains.

Companies are absorbing increasing volatility and complexity without fundamentally redefining how work gets done. Companies have confused historic practices with best practices. They are now taking those same processes and attempting to automate them with agents and agentic AI—without first stopping to ask a more fundamental question: Is it time to jump? Here I give a five-step action plan.

Read More »