Lora's Latest Post

The Risk of Venture Capital Takeover of Supply Chain Software Providers–Anaplan A New Victim

A dark cloud is laying heavy over the supply chain management technology market. The risk of the cloud is seldom discussed, but it is omnipresent. The dark cloud is the venture capital exploitation of manufacturers. How so, you might ask? It is the buying of software companies to profit from maintenance or service revenues paid by manufacturers and retailers to their established software partners.

Venture capitalists invest in the software industry to make money for their shareholders (financial markets). As a result, the commitments to business leaders–customers of the software company– become cannon fodder. The standard operating procedure in a buyout is to downsize staff–often, senior developers and business leaders leave with lucrative salary packages–and cut software development. As a software analyst, I have worked with many venture capitalists in my twenty-two years. My impression? I have never met a venture capital company that understands the supply chain management software market. Their offices are lavish, the egos large, and the talk is rich, but the results are devastating to business leaders using the software.

The recent victim is Anaplan, Inc. (NYSE: PLAN). On March 20, Anaplan announced a definitive agreement with Thoma Bravo for $66.00 per share in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $10.7 billion. The offer represents a premium of roughly 46% to the volume-weighted average price of Anaplan stock for the five days ending March 18, 2022. Upon completing the transaction, Anaplan will become a privately-held company.

Anaplan, a software-as-a-service company touting the connected enterprise planning as a marketing message, once had promise in the supply chain management market. Over the last five years, the Company struggled to build solutions deep enough to help business leaders solve today’s problems. The problem was the depth of the internal Anaplan teams to understand today’s business requirements. Yes, the solutions connected, but they were unequal to the challenge of driving better answers for business leaders with rising variability. The best deployments were in large companies with multiple applications needing a visibility layer across planning systems to facilitate collaboration. The ease of deployment with prominent consultants was also a plus.

Thoma Bravo’s stamp of company take-over and progressive reduction of value for business leaders using software is apparent in their prior track record of purchases of GHX, Elemica, Exostar, JDA, and QAD. My take? Make no mistake that driving value for shareholders in the financial markets does not drive better solutions for business leaders seeking technology to improve decision-making.

My advice? If considering purchasing Anaplan, pursue other options. If a current Anaplan client, consider alternatives, but if switching is too costly, build internal resources to ensure business continuity. Reduce the dependency on Anaplan. The Thoma Bravo announcement is a clear signal that things will change quickly for software users and not in a good way.

Venture capital investments in the software market are an ongoing risk factor for business leaders. To mitigate the risk, buy from well-funded companies, especially private companies. Following this logic, John Galt, Kinaxis, Logility, and OMP are low-risk purchases, while E2open and JDA pose more future threats to the business.

Yes, my coffee was as strong as my passion for business leaders this morning. As an independent analyst following the supply chain technology market for many years, I hate the ups and downs of venture capitalists diminishing the value of potential software. My drive is to help technology leaders help business teams drive greater value for their stakeholders.

I welcome your thoughts.

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

AI Defining a Middle Ground Between Custom and Packaged Applications in Supply Chain Planning

Supply chain planning has evolved technologically, but its underlying processes remain rooted in historic practices that no longer fit today’s volatile, complex environment. Packaged applications promise faster, lower-cost, lower-risk business outcomes, yet extensive customization, fragmented data, and rigid workflows often undermine that promise. Cloud data and AI platforms like Databricks and Snowflake offer an alternative: build interoperable applications on top of existing planning systems to address gaps in direct procurement, plan consumption, bullwhip reduction, operational planning, and dynamic master data. The opportunity is not simply to automate existing processes with AI and agentics, but to redefine how work gets done through end-to-end orchestration, value-based trade-offs, and clear decision governance.

Read More »

Reflection and Celebration for the Supply Chains to Admire Methodology

The Supply Chains to Admire to is an objective, data-driven standard for measuring supply chain excellence and moves beyond industry reputation, anecdotal evidence, and technology claims. Using revenue growth, operating margin, inventory turns, and return on invested capital (ROCE, the research evaluates how companies perform relative to industry peers over time. Here Lora shares information on an upcoming event to celebrate the Supply Chains to Admire Award Winners.

Read More »

Five Things I Don’t Understand

Solutions that we never imagined years ago are emergining, but I pause when companies are unwilling or unable to roll up their sleeves and redefine work. Historic practices are not best practices, and there is a wealth of opportunity for those that do challenge the existing status quo. .

Read More »

My Answer to Joe. The Future of APS

Traditional Advanced Planning Systems (APS) are unlikely to become true enterprise platforms because organizations remain functionally siloed, metrics are misaligned, and current APS architectures were designed for an environment that has fundamentally changed. Here I share how I think that APS systems can adapt to drive more value.

Read More »

Teaching Your Organization to Jump

Remember the story of the frog in the pot of water? If the water temperature rises slowly, the frog doesn’t recognize the danger until it is too late. Put the frog directly into boiling water, and it jumps.

I think the analogy applies to today’s supply chains.

Companies are absorbing increasing volatility and complexity without fundamentally redefining how work gets done. Companies have confused historic practices with best practices. They are now taking those same processes and attempting to automate them with agents and agentic AI—without first stopping to ask a more fundamental question: Is it time to jump? Here I give a five-step action plan.

Read More »