Lora's Latest Post

Glen Raven Meets Their Goals Through a Successful Deployment of Advanced Planning

Recently, I spoke on the future of supply chain management at the University of Tennessee Supply Chain Forum. At the end of the presentation, Ed Hamlin of Logility stopped me and engaged me in a conversation on a recent Logility implementation at Glen Raven. He was proud of the implementation and asked if I had heard of Glen Raven. As he talked, I smiled. I find Glen Raven to be a very interesting company. It is a privately-held textile company that successfully navigated the global sourcing/labor arbitrage mania of the last decade and managed to maintain a significant presence in the United States.

As a side note, my niece works as a Database Administrator at Glen Raven; and as a result, the company has been a frequent discussion at my family’s Thanksgiving dinner table. As my brother tries to figure out what his crazy sister does for a living, my niece uses her experiences at Glen Raven to translate the need for the business model. (My oldest brother is unsure why anyone would buy services from his little sister. My niece tries to defend me.)

I like case studies and readers enjoy them on the blog, so following the conference, I reached out to Ajay Bhardwaj, Director of Planning at Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, to understand his story. I appreciate his willingness to share it.

The Story

Leib Oehmig, the CEO of Glen Raven, Inc. had a goal. He wanted the company’s business to grow efficiently. For him, this meant growing top-line revenue with less supply chain inventory.  To achieve the objective, he asked Ajay Bhardwaj, Director of Planning at Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, to help.
Ajay, shown here, has a strong background of 25 years in supply chain planning. He knew that to accomplish Leib’s goal, he needed a planning system to integrate the supply chain and recognize constraints. 
About Glen Raven
Glen Raven is a privately-held textile company founded in 1880. The Company has three business units: Custom Fabrics, Technical Fabrics, and Trivantage. With a global presence of operations in the US, France, China, India, and Brazil, the company coordinates global supply for regional markets. Ajay works in the Custom Fabrics division that manufactures and markets premium performance textiles, including Sunbrella and Dickson branded products. Since 1961 the Sunbrella brand has been the leading fabric combining UV durability, cleanability, and beautiful design. The fabrics are used for applications in the Awning, Automotive Convertible Tops, Marine, Indoor and Outdoor furniture, and Contract and Healthcare furniture industries. Glen Raven is the market leader for the supply of convertible tops.
In an environment where customers demand more variety with shorter lead times, Ajay knew that an integrated supply chain planning solution could help the business to deliver against customer expectations. 
The Project
To meet the business goals, Ajay’s team began with a thorough process review of the existing planning procedures and systems, followed by the implementation of an advanced planning system that integrated all the major planning workflows of a manufacturing company.

Demand planning was implemented in six months, while tactical supply and inventory planning took twelve months. (Note, when done right, we often see that supply planning takes 1.5-2X longer than demand planning.) The implementation in the United States was for three yarn manufacturing facilities, a weaving factory, and a distribution center. In China, the rollout was for a weaving factory and outsourced yarn manufacturing. The implementation included two production instances and two development instances. The implementation included 11 integration points and 43 production specifications. Over 12 million unique data elements are transferred through the interfaces each night into the data modeler.
The team successfully completed constraint-based planning for raw materials, weaving, and finishing, including outsourced production. (Less than 25% of companies interviewed successfully complete constraint-based supply planning.)
Net result? The team met their business goals. The business grew with the same levels of inventory, and improved service levels. Today, service levels (case fill rates) are 2% above target.  Here we share some insights from Ajay:
Q. What advice would you have for others implementing supply chain planning?
Ajay: I think that it’s essential to stay focused. I recommend that other manufacturers considering this approach focus on four areas.
          Start with a clear vision of the overall objectives/goals. The vision of the CEO was helpful to help us accomplish the goals. We had a clear rallying cry and executive support. We provided weekly progress updates to the executive team and had their full support during the project.
          Involve key users in the project.  To get a widespread sense of ownership, all the key users of the system had specific roles on the project team and helped to configure the software. We worked closely with the best-of-breed solution provider, Logility, on the implementation, but we kept control of project management. A strategic aim of this project was to replace a homegrown forecasting application. The manager who developed this solution was a key player in configuring the new demand management solution.
         Have a relentless focus on execution (project management). Experience has taught me to monitor tasks very closely. If a task is not 100% complete, the questions to ask are “when will it be complete, and what is the overall impact?” I do not go by x% complete! We stayed focused on the goal; and as a result, we managed the project timeline closely.
          Avoid the temptation to model everything. The key to success is to keep the modeling simple (understandable) with a focus on what matters in the business. I think one of the success factors of the project was making sure that the critical elements of the business were modeled, but that we did not boil the ocean and make it overly complex. I wanted to stay true to the project goals.
Q. What is next?
Ajay: We have built enough support to continue the project rollout globally. It is important to track project results to gain the support of others.
Q. What do you wish you had done differently? And, why?
Ajay. With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, we could have worked with our system integrator to transfer knowledge to our team even faster through training and what-if scenario modeling. It is important to not short-change this step.
__________________
Ajay, thanks for sharing your case study with the readers. As a result, I now have an even better story to share at my family’s Thanksgiving table. But more importantly, the readers of the blog have some valuable insights to use in their scoping of Advanced Planning Systems. For me, one of the most important pieces of wisdom from Ajay is “not to model everything.” It reminds me of a story about a client I have worked with for over a decade. Because they were not clear on the goal, they have implemented four different technologies badly. While they might blame the technology company or the system integrator, the issue is that they never built their system with the goal in mind. I like this case study because there was a clear goal, definitive governance on the project plan, and the system was built with the goal in mind. Thanks, Ajay! Great advice for others.
 

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Case Study: A Scrappy Demand Management Approach

This study of Franklin Sports shines a light on the work that needs to be done at the sales account level to challenge a retail forecast, and also highlights the importance of a new technique for a forecast engine — reinforcement learning.

Artificial intelligence comes in many forms — large language models, generative AI, machine learning, unstructured text mining, deep learning, neural networks, reinforcement learning, agents, and agentics. While the industry is wigging out about agentics, I think reinforcement learning is a great step forward in the journey of Artificial Intelligence.

Read More »

Can We Side-Step the AI Spin Cycle?

When it comes to combining tech, 1+1+1 should equal more than 1. The impact should be exponential. Unfortunately, today, the answer is 0.

What do I mean? Let me explain.

I find that the supply chain technology market moves slowly along traditional technology lines. Conferences are usually focused on the use of technology, not on redefining work. This bothers me. I want it to bother you as well.

Here I share some insights to drive change.

Read More »

Supply Chain Health Check: The Power of an Orbit Chart

An orbit chart is a powerful tool for understanding the “health” of a supply chain and its potential for improvement. The supply chain is a complex, non-linear system with limited trade-offs. The relationship between trade-offs varies by industry, region, and size. The orbit chart is a diagnostic we use in the Supply Chains to Admire work. Here I explain the use case.

Read More »

Are You Writing a Check You Cannot Cash?

Don’t let a well-intending, but ill-informed consultant or technologist set an expectation that you cannot meet. No when wins when there is a check written that cannot be cashed. In this case, the consultant will move to the next account leaving you holding the bag. Fight back with a data-driven argument. Help the organization think about inventory more holistically.

Read More »

The Sad Demise of the Food Industry

For the period of 2016-2025, the industry average was 11% operating margin and 7.82 inventory turns, with a 35% decline in industry inventory performance. Few companies were aware of or adapted to the shift in industry potential.
Today, the shifts are faster as consumers trade down to cheaper brands and retail private label gains market share. Major inflationary spikes in protein, especially beef and eggs, due to supply shortages and disease-related disruptions in 2025, continue the never-ending ride in commodity volatility. Yet, companies are insular to adapt their supply chain practices. Putting AI on top of traditional supply chain processes is a recipe for disaster.

Read More »