Lora's Latest Post

shhh….

Shhh…. Listen closely.  You cannot hear them.  They are quietly working.  They don’t ask for breaks. When it comes to lunch, they are never late.  They are hard at work.  While a typical third-party logistics operation is typically ALL about labor, this one is not. 
It is ALL about the personalized EACH: the effective picking of the order of ONE.  With the rise of social commerce,warehouses are struggling to effectively pick, personalize and ship an order of ONE correctly.  Especially, if it is something like guitar strings where they all look alike.  If you ship them incorrectly to the guitar aficionados, it will reflect in your negative ratings online, where it matters more and more.
In May, I toured Quiet Logistics in Boston, where robotics are used to tackle the problem.  It was founded by Bruce Welty, CEO.  I was asked to visit by Greg Cronin, now at Quiet Logistics, who knows how much I love covering new and disruptive technologies. Robotics for picking. I love it. Zoom me up to the new world! But, wait is it a new world, or just an unappreciated disruptive technology that has found a new niche.
A Kiva robot is typically orange in color, 2 feet by 2.5 feet, and one foot high. Each robot weighs around 250 pounds, and can carry four times its weight. The maximum velocity of a robot is 1.3 meters per second. The robots navigate around the warehouse using an onboard camera to read barcode stickers on the warehouse floor. They communicate wirelessly to computer servers that run order-processing software and deliver directions.  The solution was launched in 2003 by Marty Mountz, the founder and original CEO of Webvan.  However, the adoption rate has been very low.  Read on….
The operation for Quiet Logistics went live in  April 2009.  It is a general use, multi-tenant picking system.  Their clients are often online shippers with a problem. When Musicparts.com — a rapidly growing direct consumer business– was struggling with how to ship a growing catalogue with over 500 unique items, they turned to Quiet Logistics.  They were tired of getting the negative ratings on on-line reviews for mis-shipments.  Let’s face it to the untrained eye, an “A” string looks just like a “G” string.  To satisfy orders they had eight pickers that worked eight hours, but had a 10% error rate.  With they switched to Quiet Logistics they were able to fulfill orders with one person in one hour with no errors.  But, more importantly, they went from ratings SO bad that EBay wanted to shut them down to 220 positive ratings on fulfillment.
When Gilt.com launched their business in May, it was an exercise in extreme fulfillment, ship very fast with ultimate customization for high-end luxury goods.  In this unique online presence, Gilt.com buys excess luxury goods, ships them to the Quiet Logistics warehouse, advertises them online to their exclusive community, and then leaves it to the robots to accurately pick them.  They come in all shapes and sizes with high-end luxury expectations.  The robots are flexible to handle hanging goods; bulky, high-end items; and smaller, high-value items. 
Robotics for warehouse picking is not new.  However, it just maybe an idea whose time has come.  It’s value proposition is flexibility.  It comes with a steep price.  In this world, where companies value the lowest cost/case as the defacto measurement of supply chain excellence; robotics for warehouse picking is hard to sell.  It  is one of the many supply chain technologies that has floundered because it is hard to justify.  However, readers, the world is changing.  With the Rise of Social Commerce– a redefined shopping experience that combines on-line and social technologies to improve the shopping experience–the fulfillment of ONE well will become table stakes.  It will not be about the lowest cost per unit.  It will be about systems with flexibility for inserts, tailored messages, personalized samples and PERFECT orders everytime.  While companies like the GAP, Staples, and  Zappos use this technology everyday, it has not been available as a third-party logistics offering.  At least, up until now….
The bigger story for me is why supply chain companies cannot reward flexibility in the selection of equipment like robotics for warehouse management.  It has not changed much in my thirty years of supply chain experience.  I remember a discussion with the Roger Miller, head of manufacturing, for what was then General Foods.  I was a plant engineering manager at their largest food manufacturing plant.  The proliferation of Jello flavors for puddings and gelatin was skyrocketing.  It was a maturing brand.  We had a choice to either buy a high speed machine with long runs and long change-overs or a slower machine that could change over quickly, but run at lower speeds.  He asked me, “why I was asking the question?  Wasn’t the answer obvious?  The right decisions was the high speed machine that delivered the lowest cost per case.” At that time, I could not make a compelling argument for the lower speed machine around flexibility.  It has taken me thirty years to be able to engage more deeply in speed and efficiency do not deliver the highest value for the value chain.  Not then; and certainly not now.  But, to be able to see the true beauty in Kiva robotics, and Quiet Logistics as a 3PL, you have to be grounded in how to have the debate.
What do you think?  Do you see the rise of robotics for warehouse management with the rise of social commerce?
(Let me include a disclaimer.  At Altimeter Group (www.altimetergroup.com), I cover disruptive technologies–of all kinds–that help to improve the supply chain.  I am all about covering how new technologies help companies to drive more value in their value chain.  Quiet Logistics is not an Altimeter client.  I write case studies like this with one  goal:  coverage of disruptive technologies for the supply chain with a defined value proposition. I am not a pay for play writer.  I do not write case studies for a fee. So, please don’t call me up and request one…. )

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Is your Supply Chain AI Ready?

A simple quiz to assess an organization’s AI readiness.

The pace of change is fast and furious. Every day, technology advances faster than we can digest. A great challenge to have.

Determining whether a supply chain is “AI-ready” is less about technology and more about the gray matter between the ears of supply chain leaders. Leadership, alignment, and clarity of goals matter.

Too few companies are clear on the definition of supply chain excellence. Measuring and rewarding functional metrics reduces the firm’s value. Putting agentics on top of today’s processes can make bad practices run faster, reducing value.

The toughest job for the supply chain leader is challenging existing supply chain paradigms that were defined by the limitations of decades of supply chain technologies. As the curtain lifts on the potential of new forms of technology, process redefinition is our opportunity, but only if we are clear on what drives value. (Here, I link to the Supply Chains to Admire reports to help you define value. The next report will be published on June 23rd, along with my Dynamic Benchmarking Product, to help you define value in the face of your AI readiness. More information about the launch is at the bottom of this blog.)

Read More »

Case Study: A Scrappy Demand Management Approach

This study of Franklin Sports shines a light on the work that needs to be done at the sales account level to challenge a retail forecast, and also highlights the importance of a new technique for a forecast engine — reinforcement learning.

Artificial intelligence comes in many forms — large language models, generative AI, machine learning, unstructured text mining, deep learning, neural networks, reinforcement learning, agents, and agentics. While the industry is wigging out about agentics, I think reinforcement learning is a great step forward in the journey of Artificial Intelligence.

Read More »

Can We Side-Step the AI Spin Cycle?

When it comes to combining tech, 1+1+1 should equal more than 1. The impact should be exponential. Unfortunately, today, the answer is 0.

What do I mean? Let me explain.

I find that the supply chain technology market moves slowly along traditional technology lines. Conferences are usually focused on the use of technology, not on redefining work. This bothers me. I want it to bother you as well.

Here I share some insights to drive change.

Read More »

Supply Chain Health Check: The Power of an Orbit Chart

An orbit chart is a powerful tool for understanding the “health” of a supply chain and its potential for improvement. The supply chain is a complex, non-linear system with limited trade-offs. The relationship between trade-offs varies by industry, region, and size. The orbit chart is a diagnostic we use in the Supply Chains to Admire work. Here I explain the use case.

Read More »

Are You Writing a Check You Cannot Cash?

Don’t let a well-intending, but ill-informed consultant or technologist set an expectation that you cannot meet. No when wins when there is a check written that cannot be cashed. In this case, the consultant will move to the next account leaving you holding the bag. Fight back with a data-driven argument. Help the organization think about inventory more holistically.

Read More »