Lora's Latest Post

Good-bye. I Will Go Forward by Going Forward.

Roddy Martin died Friday. Aggressive brain cancer stole his life at the early age of 64. I will miss our spirited debates and sparring matches on market trends. As a strong supporter of Supply Chain Insights, it just does not seem possible to not hear his voice when I dial his phone to chat at the end of a long day.

I worked with Roddy when I was at AMR Research from 2006 to 2010. He was my boss for two years, but I liked him better as a friend.

As a strong proponent of maturity models, many discussions centered on the movement from program-based to functional metrics and how to drive alignment. Our discussions, influenced the model shown in Figure 1 from the Book Metrics that Matter. In stages four and five of the model, the supply chain processes move from a focus on inside-out optimization to align internally, balance the enterprise goals with market potential, and drive resilience through outside-in processes. (To hear Roddy live, listen to a prior podcast.) The pandemic offered us a poignant reminder on the danger of inside-out process thinking.

Figure 1. Metrics That Matter Model Evolution

Defining Outside-In Processes

Roddy loved beer. Many discussions were at a pub at a conference or a casual meeting catching up at the airport between flights, but they always included a discussion on the importance of outside-in processes. He would pound his fist on the bar and lament the slow movement from inside-out to outside-in processes. I mainly listened to his rant, and then stated, “We never defined outside-in processes well enough when we were at AMR Research to drive adoption. We need to do this work.” He would agree. We had this discussion over-and-over again for five years.

He was the first to call when I contracted COVID-19 in March 2020. Scared on the outcome, he called me frequently. Over the course of the weeks, we discussed some work that we might do together, but life got in the way.

In December 2020, Roddy received a diagnosis of Glioblastoma. Initially, we spoke frequently. Positive and upbeat, he spoke warmly about his relationship with his doctor. I shared the work that we are doing on defining outside-in processes with Project Zebra. He was excited. “Keep going,” he said.

After March, I tried to keep him updated, but the phone quickly went to voicemail. The treatment and the disease took a quick toll. Our last call was the third week in March. He quickly lost the ability to use his phone.

Going Forward By Going Forward

Tuesday, I will travel to his wake. I want to tell him about the pilots with BSH and Western Digital and ask him to moderate the panel at the Supply Chain Insights Global Summit on outside-in processes that will definitively document the value proposition, but to no avail. He is a passionate supply chain advocate gone too soon.

His favorite saying was, “Go forward by going forward.” As I go to the wake, I am sorry we did not finish the work, that we set out to do together in a meaningful way, but I am glad that we reconnected after AMR to work together. Life is fragile and short. Roddy, “I will keep going.” This is the task in front of me.

Roddy Martin, rest in peace. I will never get the opportunity to share the pilot results with you on outside-in-process testing, but somehow, I feel your presence. I believe that you are smiling that I continue the work. I hope that you find a cold beer to your liking in heaven…

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Five Things I Don’t Understand

Solutions that we never imagined years ago are emergining, but I pause when companies are unwilling or unable to roll up their sleeves and redefine work. Historic practices are not best practices, and there is a wealth of opportunity for those that do challenge the existing status quo. .

Read More »

My Answer to Joe. The Future of APS

Traditional Advanced Planning Systems (APS) are unlikely to become true enterprise platforms because organizations remain functionally siloed, metrics are misaligned, and current APS architectures were designed for an environment that has fundamentally changed. Here I share how I think that APS systems can adapt to drive more value.

Read More »

Teaching Your Organization to Jump

Remember the story of the frog in the pot of water? If the water temperature rises slowly, the frog doesn’t recognize the danger until it is too late. Put the frog directly into boiling water, and it jumps.

I think the analogy applies to today’s supply chains.

Companies are absorbing increasing volatility and complexity without fundamentally redefining how work gets done. Companies have confused historic practices with best practices. They are now taking those same processes and attempting to automate them with agents and agentic AI—without first stopping to ask a more fundamental question: Is it time to jump? Here I give a five-step action plan.

Read More »

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Read More »

Warning: Sidestep the Narrative of the Misguided Goldiggers

Ten years ago, I started writing a book titled Stories of the Misguided Gold Diggers. The book was a collection of stories from two decades of stories of technology leaders perpetuating the myth of integrated end-to-end supply chain planning.

I dusted off the manuscript on Saturday. I think that we have a new chapter. Companies focused on putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) on top of existing architectures are putting AI Stupid on steroids.

Read More »

The Myth of End-to-End Planning

Supply chain planning, supply management, supply chain execution, network design, and transportation/logistics management operate in silos. Not much has changed over four decades. The connections flow back through transactional systems: order-to-cash and procure-to-pay. There is a myth that companies can buy an end-to-end supply chain management solution. This is largely a myth. Here we explain.

Read More »