Lora's Latest Post

Customer-Centric Supply Chains: Adding Clarity to the Muddle

shutterstock_234277492It was November. I was speaking at a client site. The topic was customer-centric supply chains. We started the morning by asking attendees to share their definition of a customer-centric supply chain. I slowly wrote the definitions on the whiteboard. At the end of the sharing I had as many definitions on the board as people in the room. The only thing that was clear was the lack of definition clarity.
Then the leader of the team crossed his arms and sighed. He said, “I am not sure if this exercise makes sense. The definition of customer-centric is perfectly clear to me. It is doing whatever the customer wants.” He then went on a rant. Quickly an atmosphere of quiet uneasiness settled over the room. The team shifted uncomfortably in their chairs.
Reflections
I cleared my throat and told a story of two clients in Houston. The companies were competitors. Each distributor delivered oil and gas products to refineries. The companies were commodity-based businesses and operated on razor-thin margins. One company defined the customer-centric strategy as, “Do whatever the customer wants.” Their costs were higher and their reliability to the customer was lower. The organization was always jumping through hoops. The second organization had a very different definition of customer-centric. Their vision was to manage distribution policies based on customer segmentation with a focus on reliability. At the second company, policies were clear and the focus was on reliable delivery.  At the end of the year I watched both companies gather in a room for the most valued supplier award. The company that jumped through hoops constantly did not win the award, while the second company won the supplier of the year. What can we learn? Reliability matters. Failed promises, no matter how well intended, have long-term consequences.
What Does Customer-Centric Mean?
As I work with clients to help them refine supply chain strategies I often find many companies will use words like customer-centric, but will fail to define the term to make it actionable. On this fall day, at this strategy workshop, this was the case.
Since many confuse demand-driven, customer-centric, and outside-in processes, during the session I shared the image in Figure 1 to jumpstart the conversation.
Figure 1. Customer-Centric Supply Chain Definition
customer-centeric
The image helped. For an hour we discussed definitions and process maturity.
Flashback During Writing
This week I am reflecting on that session as I work on the correlations and patterns in the recent research on customer-centric supply chains. In the study, 60% of companies state there is great room for improvement in their supply chains; yet, 75% of responding companies are bullish about their capabilities on being customer-centric. The average respondent had a customer-centric supply chain strategy for over five years, and 60% feel they are successful in the execution of their customer-centric strategy. My takeaway? Should they be so confident in their capabilities? I think not. Success is easier said than done.
Figure 2 shows the gaps in the execution of customer-centric policies and strategies. The top three gaps are visibility of channel inventories and orders, management of complexity, and the alignment between commercial and operations teams. These three characteristics often go hand-in-hand. When there is close alignment there is usually better management of complexity and the sharing of channel data.
Figure 2. Gaps in Customer-Centric Strategies
customer-centric
The average company uses five practices to execute a customer-centric supply chain. We share these details in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Strategies Deployed
practices
Ironically, while the biggest gap in the execution of customer-centric strategies, the implementation of channel visibility solutions is very low (16%). Is the use of channel data and customer sentiment data one of the reasons why most companies feel their supply chains are underperforming despite the belief that companies have more than five years of history in managing customer-centric policies? I am not sure because I am not done with the data analysis, but I think it is likely. As complexity increased, companies dependent only on the order signal struggle to respond at the cadence of business. What do you think?
We will publish the full report next week in our monthly newsletter. Sign up to get our regular updates on research findings, webinars and podcasts. We help supply chain leaders find answers.
 

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Read More »

Warning: Sidestep the Narrative of the Misguided Goldiggers

Ten years ago, I started writing a book titled Stories of the Misguided Gold Diggers. The book was a collection of stories from two decades of stories of technology leaders perpetuating the myth of integrated end-to-end supply chain planning.

I dusted off the manuscript on Saturday. I think that we have a new chapter. Companies focused on putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) on top of existing architectures are putting AI Stupid on steroids.

Read More »

The Myth of End-to-End Planning

Supply chain planning, supply management, supply chain execution, network design, and transportation/logistics management operate in silos. Not much has changed over four decades. The connections flow back through transactional systems: order-to-cash and procure-to-pay. There is a myth that companies can buy an end-to-end supply chain management solution. This is largely a myth. Here we explain.

Read More »

Lead Time: A Broken Gossamer

If you are struggling with supply chain planning, dancing in the light of shiny objects, and scratching your head, please read on. My goal is to help you.

Please do not AI Stupid. What do I mean? AI Stupid is putting agents and agentics on top of existing architectures believing that making them faster and hands free add value. To me, this is fools play.

I love AI. I am excited about new technologies. To this end, I want to shine a light on how new technologies can help address the black holes and inconsistencies in today’s supply chain, which largely stem from the limitations of the first generation of supply chain planning and execution technologies. In this blog, I give you three places to start.

Read More »

Do You Need a Supply Chain Coach?

Supply chain is where the rubber hits the road. For a public company, over 40% of market capitalization is tied to the trade-offs between growth, operating margin, inventory management, and Return on Capital Employed.

The road for supply chain improvement is fraught with issues. Here we share some and offer some advice.

Read More »

Is your Supply Chain AI Ready?

A simple quiz to assess an organization’s AI readiness.

The pace of change is fast and furious. Every day, technology advances faster than we can digest. A great challenge to have.

Determining whether a supply chain is “AI-ready” is less about technology and more about the gray matter between the ears of supply chain leaders. Leadership, alignment, and clarity of goals matter.

Too few companies are clear on the definition of supply chain excellence. Measuring and rewarding functional metrics reduces the firm’s value. Putting agentics on top of today’s processes can make bad practices run faster, reducing value.

The toughest job for the supply chain leader is challenging existing supply chain paradigms that were defined by the limitations of decades of supply chain technologies. As the curtain lifts on the potential of new forms of technology, process redefinition is our opportunity, but only if we are clear on what drives value. (Here, I link to the Supply Chains to Admire reports to help you define value. The next report will be published on June 23rd, along with my Dynamic Benchmarking Product, to help you define value in the face of your AI readiness. More information about the launch is at the bottom of this blog.)

Read More »