Lora's Latest Post

Cradle to Grave?

Last week, I interviewed Robert Byrne, founder of Terra Technology on his demand planning benchmarking study. I enjoy creating the Straight Talk podcast series, and Rob’s findings in his benchmark study are always thought-provoking. This is his fifth year of studying demand processes. In this blog, I share the findings and why I think they should matter to supply chain professionals in consumer-facing industries.
Based on Rob’s study, the number of items in the Consumer Products Industry has proliferated by 30% over the course of the last six years. In the same time frame, shipments rose 2% while the average sales per item fell 22%. As a result, managing the supply chain is more complex. Supply chain leaders may not wake up in the morning and exclaim, “I have a longer tail!” But, in fact, over the last decade the widening of the product portfolio has resulted in fewer shipments per item and lumpier demand. Today, 50% of items only contribute 1% of sales.
What is a long tail? In Figure 1, I share a representation of a company’s “long tail.” I think that it is useful for companies to plot the length of their tail every two years to understand if they are making progress on managing products from cradle to grave. Most are not…. The tail is growing and as a result there are hidden costs in the business due to complexity. Despite all of the focused attempts to implement new forms of demand planning, the business costs and inventory spiral out of control due to unchecked complexity.
Figure 1. Calculating the Long Tail
LONG TAIL
With the lengthening of the product tail (volume of shipments per order and the frequency of orders for each product), the demand signal is lumpier and more erratic. While traditional companies are still looking at improving traditional forecasting technologies, and improving the rules for forecast consumption,  I think it is time to take a different stance:

  1. Item Rationalization. The first step is item rationalization. Demand error and bias is higher for slower-moving products. As the product portfolio has increased, companies have more slower-moving products. One of the options is to rationalize the product line and manage products from cradle to grave. While most companies focus on only the cradle—or the birth of the product—rationalization is growing in importance. The problem has multiple dimensions. Most leaders do not know the cost of complexity with the increase of items; and instead of introducing variety to the shopper, many companies have confused the shopper resulting in the purchase of more compelling, less complex product portfolios. So, as companies manage their stage-gate processes for item introductions, it is a good time to also design and implement processes to focus on item rationalization by market. It is time to manage product lines from cradle to grave. The absence of these process has driven the supply chain out of balance resulting in increased inventory and unnecessary cost that does not drive brand differentiation.
  2. Test and Learn. To aid item rationalization, the use of test-and-learn concepts, in combination with cognitive reasoning, is useful to test the market basket impacts of portfolio shifts per market. While the traditional marketing and product development programs have been about the additional of item, the consumer products company that is in step with the market understands it is about having the right assortment in the right markets. This requires analytics that can learn and adapt as markets shift..
  3. Manage New Item Bias. In Rob’s study new item bias was 22%. With new products representing 36% of the product line, this is growing problem. In new product launch, companies are overconfident and have a positive bias. This is 4X higher than other products in the line. Traditional approaches like consensus forecasting can make this bias even worse.
  4. Need for Demand Sensing. As the tail of the supply chain lengthens, demand sensing matters more than ever. The longer the tail, the more important short-term forecasting; and, the less effective traditional forecasting techniques are in driving replenishment. The redefinition of inside-out to outside-in processes grows in importance. If you are scratching your head on what this means, it is the use of point-of-sale data and demand-sensing analytics to reduce the latency of the demand signal to plan and be better in-step with the market. Traditional order management to distribution requirements planning (DRP) adds latency and distorts the signal. This grows more critical with the longer tail. Demand latency for one company that I worked with last week was nine days for fast-moving products and 60 days for products in the tail. The longer the tail, the greater the need for demand sensing and the use of channel data.
  5. Translate Independent Demand into Production Planning. In addition to demand sensing, with the lengthening of the product tail in advanced companies, the independent item demand is translated into a segmented production plan to reduce cycle stock. This happens through integration of demand sensing data into the product rhythm wheel in production planning. Automation of demand sensing into production planning is critical to reduce cycle stock and not short-circuit production. As the tail becomes longer, the automation of production planning becomes more critical.  This work into product segmented production planning is critical to manage the lumpier, less predictable demand patterns.

2015 is a year for belt-tightening. Volume has slowed, and most companies are struggling with new product launch processes. Perhaps the place to start is with product rationalization and the identification of product opportunities that stem from the consolidation of product lines. I think R&D and product development cannot just be about launch. Instead, I prefer a cradle-to-grave focus. If the product lines cannot be reduced in complexity, I think it is time to redesign supply chain processes. Unfortunately, today, most companies are not working on either. The concepts of demand latency and the impacts of the longer tail are not very well-understood.
 
Data sourced from the Terra Technology 2014 Benchmarking Study

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Read More »

Warning: Sidestep the Narrative of the Misguided Goldiggers

Ten years ago, I started writing a book titled Stories of the Misguided Gold Diggers. The book was a collection of stories from two decades of stories of technology leaders perpetuating the myth of integrated end-to-end supply chain planning.

I dusted off the manuscript on Saturday. I think that we have a new chapter. Companies focused on putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) on top of existing architectures are putting AI Stupid on steroids.

Read More »

The Myth of End-to-End Planning

Supply chain planning, supply management, supply chain execution, network design, and transportation/logistics management operate in silos. Not much has changed over four decades. The connections flow back through transactional systems: order-to-cash and procure-to-pay. There is a myth that companies can buy an end-to-end supply chain management solution. This is largely a myth. Here we explain.

Read More »

Lead Time: A Broken Gossamer

If you are struggling with supply chain planning, dancing in the light of shiny objects, and scratching your head, please read on. My goal is to help you.

Please do not AI Stupid. What do I mean? AI Stupid is putting agents and agentics on top of existing architectures believing that making them faster and hands free add value. To me, this is fools play.

I love AI. I am excited about new technologies. To this end, I want to shine a light on how new technologies can help address the black holes and inconsistencies in today’s supply chain, which largely stem from the limitations of the first generation of supply chain planning and execution technologies. In this blog, I give you three places to start.

Read More »

Do You Need a Supply Chain Coach?

Supply chain is where the rubber hits the road. For a public company, over 40% of market capitalization is tied to the trade-offs between growth, operating margin, inventory management, and Return on Capital Employed.

The road for supply chain improvement is fraught with issues. Here we share some and offer some advice.

Read More »

Is your Supply Chain AI Ready?

A simple quiz to assess an organization’s AI readiness.

The pace of change is fast and furious. Every day, technology advances faster than we can digest. A great challenge to have.

Determining whether a supply chain is “AI-ready” is less about technology and more about the gray matter between the ears of supply chain leaders. Leadership, alignment, and clarity of goals matter.

Too few companies are clear on the definition of supply chain excellence. Measuring and rewarding functional metrics reduces the firm’s value. Putting agentics on top of today’s processes can make bad practices run faster, reducing value.

The toughest job for the supply chain leader is challenging existing supply chain paradigms that were defined by the limitations of decades of supply chain technologies. As the curtain lifts on the potential of new forms of technology, process redefinition is our opportunity, but only if we are clear on what drives value. (Here, I link to the Supply Chains to Admire reports to help you define value. The next report will be published on June 23rd, along with my Dynamic Benchmarking Product, to help you define value in the face of your AI readiness. More information about the launch is at the bottom of this blog.)

Read More »