Lora's Latest Post

Buckle Up! I Think It Will Be a WILD Ride.

Supply chain talent is constrained. As we try to find a solution for the supply chain talent gap, there are more questions than answers.
Last week, I attended a Penn State networking conference on the topic. It was attended by 35 supply chain leaders.  This week, I continued to learn about talent development by facilitating an executive workshop at the Logility Connections conference.
To prepare for the conference, I worked with Karin Bursa, Vice President of Logility marketing, to complete a survey of 44 Logility clients on the state of talent in the supply chain. (I think that the responses from the Logility customers are typical of the industry.) In this blog post, I share insights from these two experiences.
At a high level, supply chain leadership teams are facing a talent shortage. It is driven by three forces: baby boomer retirement, growth in emerging economies, and growing recognition of the importance of supply chain as a discipline. No one has an answer; but here, I share some insights on the approaches teams are trying.

The Problem

Data and Understanding. Getting clear on the problem is the first step. Despite 30 years of supply chain evolution, as shown in Figure 1, executive teams are still struggling to understand supply chain.
In the last year, the talent gap has become more acute.  It is a common for executives to look at the situation and question why jobs have been vacant for SO long. Many wonder if “ the HR department is doing their job.” In short, it is a new era. There are new obstacles. Closing the gap of understanding by the supply chain executive team is the first place to start.
Figure 1. Supply Chain Management Pain

Open Jobs. Of the 44 respondents, 52% currently have open supply chain planning jobs. Business pain is acute in the area of demand planning.  The average time to fill a job is five months. I believe that this is only going to get worse.
Building retreads –stealing planners from other companies–is not going to be an answer.
I also believe that hiring students from supply chain programs at Universities will not resolve the problem. Why? The graduates from schools like Penn State are heavily recruited. As a result, only large companies with well-established recruiting programs will be successful with this approach.
Vertical Silos. While companies talk of breaking down vertical silos, only 27% of companies actively manage supply chain careers focused on cross-functional training (across make, source and deliver); and only 16% have a human resources department focused on the management of supply chain talent. As shown in Figure 2, in the survey responses, there is a clear gap in job progression opportunities. Skill requirements are also changing.  The planner today needs to be a combination of analytical skills, business knowledge and influence skills.
Figure 2. Today and Five Years

My Take

Demand is eclipsing supply. The gap will grow larger. Buckle your seatbelt….
There are no “Sure-fire” answers, but here are some things people are trying:
Invest and Grow your Own. I do not believe that the industry need for planners will be satisfied by the current programs at business schools. Graduating students are being courted heavily, and many have unrealistic expectations. I think that companies will need to actively recruit from other disciplines –engineers and math students– and train them through active cross-functional development programs to be supply chain leaders. The Johnson &  Johnson Gold Program or the Intel Supply Chain Masters Program are good reference models for the industry.
Actively Partner with Local Schools. Go to your local school and try to get momentum with internships and co-op programs. Work to train talent in disciplines that are not as great in demand.
Career Move for Customer Service Employees? One company was having good experience in training talented customer service representatives to be planners. They were investing in training and working on teaching long-term employees new skills. I find this to be an interesting idea. Senior customer service respresentatives know the customers and the supply chain constraints.
Oops! Plane is ready to land. Gotta wrap this up!  I am off to Australia to speak to a conference.  And, I will miss my flight. We will be continuing this discussion on the SCI Community.
Also, please join us for our first webinar on September 24th.  We will be sharing insights on supply chain financial benchmark data and evaluating how companies historically make trade-offs.  It is designed for anyone with an interest in metrics that matter (reference http://supplychaininsights.com/upcoming-webinars/).

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

AI Defining a Middle Ground Between Custom and Packaged Applications in Supply Chain Planning

Supply chain planning has evolved technologically, but its underlying processes remain rooted in historic practices that no longer fit today’s volatile, complex environment. Packaged applications promise faster, lower-cost, lower-risk business outcomes, yet extensive customization, fragmented data, and rigid workflows often undermine that promise. Cloud data and AI platforms like Databricks and Snowflake offer an alternative: build interoperable applications on top of existing planning systems to address gaps in direct procurement, plan consumption, bullwhip reduction, operational planning, and dynamic master data. The opportunity is not simply to automate existing processes with AI and agentics, but to redefine how work gets done through end-to-end orchestration, value-based trade-offs, and clear decision governance.

Read More »

Reflection and Celebration for the Supply Chains to Admire Methodology

The Supply Chains to Admire to is an objective, data-driven standard for measuring supply chain excellence and moves beyond industry reputation, anecdotal evidence, and technology claims. Using revenue growth, operating margin, inventory turns, and return on invested capital (ROCE, the research evaluates how companies perform relative to industry peers over time. Here Lora shares information on an upcoming event to celebrate the Supply Chains to Admire Award Winners.

Read More »

Five Things I Don’t Understand

Solutions that we never imagined years ago are emergining, but I pause when companies are unwilling or unable to roll up their sleeves and redefine work. Historic practices are not best practices, and there is a wealth of opportunity for those that do challenge the existing status quo. .

Read More »

My Answer to Joe. The Future of APS

Traditional Advanced Planning Systems (APS) are unlikely to become true enterprise platforms because organizations remain functionally siloed, metrics are misaligned, and current APS architectures were designed for an environment that has fundamentally changed. Here I share how I think that APS systems can adapt to drive more value.

Read More »

Teaching Your Organization to Jump

Remember the story of the frog in the pot of water? If the water temperature rises slowly, the frog doesn’t recognize the danger until it is too late. Put the frog directly into boiling water, and it jumps.

I think the analogy applies to today’s supply chains.

Companies are absorbing increasing volatility and complexity without fundamentally redefining how work gets done. Companies have confused historic practices with best practices. They are now taking those same processes and attempting to automate them with agents and agentic AI—without first stopping to ask a more fundamental question: Is it time to jump? Here I give a five-step action plan.

Read More »